Karen Strang ([info]karen_strang) wrote,
@ 2007-04-07 09:49:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
The real "Identity Crisis"


Superman is the Last Son of Krypton.  Always has been, always will be.  Even during his "death" and resurrection in the 90s, his backstory remained the same.  He was sent to earth by his loving father and provides us with an example of goodness and strength.

Batman is Bruce Wayne, a millionaire playboy whose parents died at the hands of a mugger in the back alley of a movie theater in Gotham City.  He vowed then, as a boy, to one day avenge his parents' deaths, a vow that has led to a never-ending quest for justice for an entire city.

These things don't change.  These things are sacred.  To change these things would be a betrayal of the characters (and thus the valuable corporate brand they represent).  Hal Jordan is always a test pilot, Billy Batson is always a homeless boy, Eel O'Brien is always a criminal who gets some gunk dropped on him.

That's how things are for men in the DC Universe.

Yes, things do get shuffled around, and minor characters do get reinvented when it serves the publisher's pleasure, and then there's the whole genre-killing "multiverse" nightmare, but for the important brands names, Superman is always the Last Son of Krypton and Batman is always the Dark Knight of Gotham.

How are things for Wonder Woman?  She is the third of "The Big Three," how are things for her?  Surely, one would think, for a brand as important as her, her backstory would never change, right?  She's the Amazonian Princess, born to be untouched by Man's World, yet destined to be its savior.  Right?  Isn't that who Wonder Woman is?

Well, no, not always.



In the late '60s, Wonder Woman renounced her Amazon past and powers (why? well, to help out her boyfriend, of course) and became a gun-toting super-spy.  The headline of the first issue says it all: "Forget the Old...the NEW Wonder Woman is here!"  And we see that the "NEW" Wonder Woman, in her fashionable new Emma Peel duds, has painted a big "X" over that old hag in yesterday's clothes, much like a proud new girlfriend would tar the reputation of her antecedent.  Why would she do this?  Well obviously she disdains that "old" Wonder Woman, that sorry old biddy with her square looks and her frumpy outfits.  She hates her past, she hates who she is, she wants to reinvent herself.  Why?  Well, the mercantile answer is "sales were dropping," but the psychological answer is "to please her male readers."

Forget the old, the new is here!  Let's think about that for a moment.  Can one imagine a headline crowing "Forget The Old Batman!" "Forget the Old Flash!" or even "Forget The Old Martian Manhunter!"  DC, obviously, does not consider Diana a human being, but rather a product to market to a changing demographic, like a soap or a car or a TV.  Or a girlfriend.  Disdain the old, throw it away, celebrate the new.

What does this say to boys?  It says "DC recognizes your needs!  You're sick of that old sex object?  Here's a NEW sex object!" (and certainly those wonderful new clothes will never look silly!) 

What does it say to girls?  It says "If you want to stay appealing, you've got to be willing to give up your strength, buy all the new clothes, and hate yourself."

I do not think I state the case too strongly.

Who is Supergirl?  This image is a good place to start:



Here we see not one or two but six different Supergirls, all with distinct backgrounds and personalities.  (And all a bunch of come-hither sluts, but that's a topic for another day.)

Supergirl's bio seems pretty straightforward.  She's Kara, Superman's cousin, another survivor of Krypton, right?  Well, it's true up until the dreaded Crisis on Infinite Earths when, for branding purposes, it was decided by the folks at DC that only Superman could be the Last Kryptonian.  So Supergirl was killed off and then simply reinvented.  As a blob of protoplasm, created by Lex Luthor.  Holy wish fulfillment!  Supergirl in a test-tube, lounging around Lex's apartment, dressed in skimpy outfits, powerless in comparison to her old self (but of course), and serving at Lex's whim.  What could that possibly mean?  (Lex, for good measure, was suddenly young, bearded, and had a full head of hair -- a virile new Lex to dominate the new weakling Supergirl.)  Following that, she is "merged" with a real human girl, then shows up again later as the future daughter of Superman, then later still as Superman's cousin again, but this time a different cousin.  And then she turns evil.  Which, believe me, I can understand.

Jesus Fucking Christ on a pogo stick, what the hell are they thinking with this crap?  Because I mean face it, at this point Supergirl isn't anything any more, she's a blonde with tits in a Superman outfit.  This is no modification for a shifting market, this is homicidal.  What contempt DC has for her!  What contempt they have for their female readers!  Supergirl!  Last Daughter of Krypton!  Until we need a new one, then, hey, kill the bitch off, reform her as an automaton, put her in someone else's body, do whatever the hell you want with her.  She's only a superhuman, what's she going to do about it?  As long as she's got blond hair and big tits, she's still Supergirl, right?  One's as good as another!  Why does she need anything like a personality?

Almost as bad as her total lack of identity, Supergirl no longer stands for anything.  Superman stands for truth and justice, and always has, but I have to say, once you've been reinvented as a blob of protoplasm, you kind of can't stand for anything any more, except for the ever-changing desires of male readers.

And then, of course, there is Power Girl, pictured here in repose by the inestimable Adam Hughes.



Power Girl began life as, yes, another last surviving Kryptonian (at this point I'm wondering if maybe Krypton never blew up at all).  She had, yes, enormous knockers and an aggressive fighting style, but at least, Jiminy Crickets, she was an actual, you know, superheroCrisis simply eliminated her from the universe, and she was brought back as a completely different person, the grand-daughter of an Atlantean sorcerer.  Same hair, same outfit, same tits, completely different person.  Who cares?  What does it matter?  A woman, to the editors and publishers at DC, is her outfit, her hair and her boobs, what the hell difference does her, you know, life story matter?  Power Girl has had a kid she's forgotten about, she's had her powers taken away on a moment's notice, she's gotten herself hoodwinked by a spaceship, for Christ's sake!  And then, in the Justice League television show, Power Girl is reinvented yet again, this time as a clone of Supergirl, except, you know, with bigger tits, because there's always room for improvement, and renamed (gulp) Galatea.

And then there's Batgirl.



There have been many Batgirls, just as there have been many Robins.  Betty Kane, then Barbara Gordon, then Helena Bertinelli, then Cassandra Cain.  Okay, that happens.

I happen to like Barbara Gordon.  That's me.  She seems to me to be the best iteration of the character.  She's a librarian (that is, "smart") by day, and an ass-kicking crimefighter (that is, "tough") by night.  "Smart" and "tough" seems like a good combination for a female crime-fighter.  (I can't speak to her red handbag pictured above.)  

What happened to Barbara Gordon?  Well, she got shot by the Joker, and paralyzed, and became Oracle, a wheelchair-bound homebody whose superpower is surfing the internet.  Why?  Batman got his back broken back there somewhere, why isn't he wheelchair bound?  Why can't there be a miracle cure for Barbara Gordon?  Why can't she be allowed to put on her skin-tight batsuit again and swing through the mean streets of Gotham once more?

Well, because she is, as the boys like to say, "damaged goods."  She's in a wheelchair.  You might feel sympathy for a beautiful girl in a wheelchair, but who would want to fuck her?  Only for the sake of mercy.  DC is "done" with Barbara Gordon.  Now she's the helpful ex, the girl who can't quite let go, the bespectacled "good girl" who will get you out of a jam but will, at the end of the day, be at home alone.  But that's okay, because DC always has a "NEW!" Batgirl to offer you, always another set of tits in a black suit to fantasize about, no need to wonder what happens to "old" sex symbols -- they're always around, alone, just waiting to be "useful."

The list, unfortunately, goes on.  Huntress is the daughter of Bruce Wayne and Catwoman, until she's not.  Catwoman is Selina Kyle, until she's not.  Hawkgirl is Sheira Hall, until she's not, Black Canary is Dinah Lance, until she's replaced by her own daughter -- calling Billy Wilder, someone found your Fedora.

And then there is Wonder Girl.  Wonder Girl is Diana as a younger person, right?  Well, no.  Or, she is, unless she's Diana's "younger sister,"  Donna Troy, who is or is not an Amazon, or else is a mortal given powers, or else she's a goddess-created twin sister, or else she's Cassandra Sandsmark, the daughter of a mortal woman and Zeus (ouch!). 

Is it any wonder that the "Women in Refrigerators" device shows up so often in DC narratives?  The women of the DCU aren't human beings, and certainly not ever at the level of their male counterparts.  They're props, disposable, mere reflections of their male protagonists' (and readers') desires.  If DC ever wonders why more girls don't read their comics, they might consider wondering first what a girl is.  People, male and female alike, haven't been reading Batman for 70 years because he's got a cool suit, they're fascinated by the character, the Dark Knight waging his never-ending war on crime.  But not one of the major female heroes of the DCU has made it from origin to now without changing her identity.

UPDATE: It occurs to me, upon reflection, that when Green Lantern came home to find his girlfriend in his refrigerator, that the editors may have been expressing Green Lantern's need for a new refrigerator.  He had probably had the old one since college.
hit counter html code



(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Thank you
[info]meghan_sfz
2007-04-08 06:16 am UTC (link)
Thank you for your knowledge and your comtempt of the way women are disposable in comics. You mentioned my two favorite women in DC--Barbara Gordon and Huntress (as Batman and Catwoman's daughter), and yes, both have been ill-served. For God's sake, spare yourself examining Jean Grey as Phoenix in all her varied forms, or more importantly her bizarre relationship with Scott Summers, a man who only seems to sleep with the genetic clone of his presumed dead wife (Jean), or telepaths (like his presumed dead wife). Oh, occasionally he will sleep with his presumed dead wife (or her avatar) . . . I love comics, but it doesn't mean I can't hate them a little , too.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Thank you
[info]humdrumtown
2007-04-08 02:38 pm UTC (link)
I feel the same as you both do often, though I must say I am a fan of Scott and Emma because when she's with him he's less of a crap character. And honestly when Pryor was first created she wasn't created as Jean's clone. Chris Claremont didn't want her to be a clone of Jean. Therefore, I think its more a matter of Scott having a certain taste in women, just as I have a set of physical attributes in men that I prefer. Scott's still an ass, though. I agree. I just like to weigh my opinions with how the original writers felt, sometimes, because I feel it is a disservice to not feel good about the good writers who do care about the characters regardless of gender. Part of the Scott problem would be the writers and fans who border on fanaticism with the Scott/Jean pairing. They'll turn any twist (like ::shock:: Pryor looking like Jean) into a way to make that pairing come together again. Doesn't matter if we completely do something against character or make ANYONE look like an ass so long as the pairing survives.

I think the only reinvention of Wonder Woman I'm not as angry about would be the 60s one, though. I don't like that she doesn't have powers, but in retrospect I know what they were trying to do. The writer even stated that he took away her powers because he wanted her to be a strong woman with or without them. Then after Stein complained to him that she was one of the three, one with the best powers, he retracted and apologized for taking her powers away. Yes it was a bid to boost sales, but in many ways he was trying to wipe away the crazy past of Wonder Woman bondage. I'm more angry about recent changes to her character. The more recent changes to her history and in Infinite Crisis she killed someone going against the principles of the Justice League. Why Wonder Woman? Batman has more pent up anger than anyone. But no. She's the one stuck with the shitty decision to kill one man in order to save many others. Then she gets the holier-than-thou treatment from the other two-thirds of the Trio.

I also can't agree with your (Strang) anger that the writers change the characters when the sales go down. It happens because, as you say, comic books are a business. They are a product of corporations. Hal Jordan gets replaced by Kyle. Superman DIES. It's all a bid for better sales.

Barbara Gordon and Huntress. Well no one could argue with you about those two, and who would want to? They were majorly fucked over by DC, an I'm glad you took the time to say all you did because so many don't seem to care.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thank you
[info]karen_strang
2007-04-08 03:36 pm UTC (link)
I...can't agree with your anger that the writers change the characters when the sales go down. It happens because, as you say, comic books are a business.

For what it's worth, I think that, most of the time, the writers don't change the characters when sales go down; I think that decision comes from higher up.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thank you
[info]humdrumtown
2007-04-08 10:54 pm UTC (link)
"For what it's worth, I think that, most of the time, the writers don't change the characters when sales go down; I think that decision comes from higher up."

:-P Sorry, that's even what I meant to say. It's so unfair, too, because Chris Claremont really cares about his characters and hates when awful changes are made to them. He created a lot of wonderful characters in Marvel that have gotten fucked over. He's probably one of the most well-intentioned writers in the entire company.

I think he's always had a soft spot for Storm and he did some of her best stories (I barely like the character, so me saying this is a big deal). Of course, now she's gone and gotten herself married and it was possibly one of THE stupidest things to happen besides Captain America's death (though isn't that symbolic...)

Truly, though, I do love that you take the time to say these things about comic books. People use it as an excuse that because the readers are predominately male that somehow it is okay to ruin female characters (either through changes or by their very creation).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Thank you
[info]prodigal
2007-04-17 07:11 pm UTC (link)
Ironically, the wedding can be laid at Claremont's feet because he's the one who established that Ororo and T'Challa were childhood sweethearts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dizfactor
2007-04-11 07:17 am UTC (link)
I think Barbara Gordon would have had a comic-book miracle cure by now and become Batgirl again had Ostrander not made lemonade with the lemons left behind by The Killing Joke.

I love Barbara as Batgirl, but I also think Oracle is a really bad-ass character you're giving short shrift here. She's the first real Information Age superhero and the most high-profile disabled superhero in the DCU.

(Reply to this)


[info]sanguinepen
2007-04-17 05:33 pm UTC (link)
WOW thank you - that was incredible. As a fan of Earth Two Huntress, I so feel your outrage.

(Reply to this)


[info]prodigal
2007-04-17 07:09 pm UTC (link)
Can one imagine a headline crowing "Forget The Old Batman!" "Forget the Old Flash!" or even "Forget The Old Martian Manhunter!"
In all fairness, they did make an attempt at the first of those, when they broke Bruce's back and has Azrael don his razor-sharp suit of armor and start delivering the kind of lethal justice they thought people wanted. But also in all fairness, at least with Batman, they realised that they'd fucked things up beyond belief.

Donna is an even better example of what you're discussing than you stated - the reason she wound up with such a ridiculously tangled-up origin is that, when they were creating the Teen Titans, nobody realised that she was just the teenage incarnation of Diana until after the book had been running awhile.

(Reply to this)

A dead-on summary of DC's superheroine inconsistency
[info]vp19
2007-04-18 01:23 am UTC (link)
In trying to cater too much to its core market of adolescent males during the 1960s, DC refused to take women seriously as characters, but only mirrored its audience's perception of them -- and their fears of strong women. Remember, in the late sixties not only was Wonder Woman temporarily depowered, but when the Doom Patrol's run ended, who was the only character killed off and thus unable to reappear when the book was first revived? You guessed it -- the lone female, Rita Farr, aka Elasti-Girl.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: A dead-on summary of DC's superheroine inconsistency
[info]prodigal
2007-04-18 02:09 am UTC (link)
Not exactly - all of them died in that issue. It's just that later writers decided to bring them all back at different times, with Robotman being the first resurrection when the book was relaunched nine years after the original team's deaths. It took a little over a decade before Negative Mand and the Chief were brought back, and the one good thing to come out of Byrne's run on the title was Rita's return to the living.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]andrusi
2007-04-18 03:53 am UTC (link)
In all fairness, many of the characters you mention are secondary characters to a "main" superhero. Supergirl and Power Girl are Superman derivatives, Batgirl is part of Batman's vast array of sidekicks, and so on. For such characters to go through major identity shifts is not all that uncommon--Robin's been four different people, for instance.

Of course, that doesn't explain Black Canary (Wonder Woman's reinvention happened in the sixties, which is reason enough to avoid asking "why?" under any circumstances), and it raises a related issue: the tendency of female superheroes to be merely side notes in a story with a male star.

(Reply to this)


(Anonymous)
2007-04-18 04:01 pm UTC (link)
You've hit the nail straight on the head here. This is why I'm convinced the Anti-Monitor is somehow behind the rampant misoogyny in the DCU.

The problem is, I like the post-Crisis Helena (Huntress/Question forever!) and Barbara Gordon I think became an even stronger character as Oracle.

Still, then we have Cassandra Cain, who turned evil for no good reason, Wonder Girl Cassie Sandsmark, who was created by John Byrne, people only liked her after Peter David got a hold of her, and the Johns dumped Peter David's characterization.And speaking of Young Justice, we haven't seen Empress. Or Secret. Or Arrowette. Fire has turned into an ex-Brazillian assasin, which I'm sure was not originally a part of her history. Dr. Light II had a much softer personality after Crisis on Infinite Earths. Starfire has been widowed twice. Raven has been through so many complicated changes-she's good, evil, good, evil again, golden spirit, and now she's a teenager for some godforsaken reason.

But there are always exceptions. The best example is one Big Barda. Who is still more or less the same character since the 70s, with a possible exception in DC Animated's Batman Beyond. For some reason, the superhero girlfriends have been mostly unchanged, namely Lois Lane and Linda Park, although the latter seems to have vanished with Wally.Unfortunatly, that's basically it. Other candidates-Black Alice, Manhunter,Shining Knight II, even Lady Blackhawk are too new to be exempt from this.

(Reply to this)


[info]bensanaz
2007-04-18 05:48 pm UTC (link)
I am 97% certain this is not the response you want, but the statement "You might feel sympathy for a beautiful girl in a wheelchair, but who would want to fuck her?" is generally inapplicable to much of male fandom's perception of Barbara Gordon/Oracle.

Sorry, that's the most tasteful way I could think of to put it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]karen_strang
2007-04-18 08:25 pm UTC (link)
Are you saying that men do want to fuck Oracle?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bensanaz
2007-04-19 01:03 am UTC (link)
More or less. Which doesn't invalidate your points, of course.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Watch batman beyond...
[info]mikeyed
2007-05-30 06:04 am UTC (link)
Barbara Gordon is treated pretty well there. She's strong, smart, is married, carries on a leadership role, and holds her own. I always remembered her since watching that show as a kid. It just goes to show that as long as you see one good role model it surely helps, which also goes to show that female characters from what you're talking about are very much treated badly and it's hard to find a respectable female role model in comic books these days, since Batman beyond has been off the air for 6 years now and she's a minor character at that.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

oh, wait
[info]mikeyed
2007-05-30 06:12 am UTC (link)
well, I don't know if marriage is a plus, but at least she hasn't become some spinster lady still pining away for Bruce or something.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(17 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…